ridicully: (Default)
Ridicully ([personal profile] ridicully) wrote2007-10-22 09:47 pm

OMG, HP. (Work has made me late for the wank. Damn you!)

While, Dumbledore being gay is cool on a number of levels, not the last of which is the fact how much everyone is freaking out about it, the quote that made me laugh the most from that interview is this one:

Q: In the Goblet of Fire Dumbledore said his brother was prosecuted for practicing inappropriate charms [JKR buries her head, to laughter] on a goat; what were the inappropriate charms he was practicing on that goat?
JKR: How old are you?
Eight.
JKR: I think that he was trying to make a goat that was easy to keep clean [laughter], curly horns. That's a joke that works on a couple of levels. I really like Aberforth and his goats. But you know Aberforth having this strange fondness for goats if you've read book seven, came in really useful to Harry, later on, because a goat, a stag, you know. If you're a stupid Death Eater, what's the difference. So, that is my answer to YOU.

HP

[identity profile] synergybc.livejournal.com 2007-10-24 04:36 am (UTC)(link)
I'll admit that I don't get the HP craze at all from the start so you won't wonder why I ask the following: why does it matter if a character is gay? And why would Rowling have to make such an announcement? Was it something she intentionally wrote in and was completely going over everyone's head or is she for some unknown reason retroactively trying to make him gay?? That latter would be really fucked and stupid. A character is a character, in my opinion, not to be changed later on.