And because it's not spamming if it's less than three times a day (and I feel like spamming today):

[ridicully]

I really, really, *really* need to try this some time, just to satisfy my inner pyromaniac as well as the five year old.
Sparkler bombs. Ohhhhhhhh!

eXpressive: 6/10
Practical: 9/10
Physical: 3/10
Giver: 4/10

You are a XPIT--Expressive Practical Intellectual Taker. This makes you a Manager.

You are cool, thoughtful and intelligent. Your approach and your sense of humor are under-the-radar, your charm is undeniable. You keep everything under control. You have distinctive vocal mannerisms. You may not have much interest in approaching strangers, but when you do, you are successful.

You will probably end up with someone beautiful, fascinating and off-balance. While your partner may steal the limelight, it's you that keeps things running smoothly and provides stability in your relationship. If you are with someone as contemplative and hard-headed as you, you can have a tough time.

Your greatest asset is that you tackle conflict as it rises -- you don't ignore it and let it brew. If you have a partner that *does* let it brew, it will make you crazy! You can find yourself fighting for two -- trying to anticipate your partner's needs and draw their feelings out -- which is exhausting and, well, not your job.

You would never cheat. You would make an excellent spouse. When your spouse's friends met you, they would think, "Crap, why couldn't I get that one?"

Of the 87048 people who have taken this quiz, 5.8 % are this type.

I don't know if sometimes generating some weird fascination equals charm. And if I'm really eXpressive is also up for debate. But otherwise I'd be happy if this was true *g*.

Comments

[here-be-dragons.livejournal.com]

This is totally random . . . but I have a question I thought you might be able to answer for a friend of mine. She's planning to write a book, and she is wondering if this premise is feasible:

A virus that is spread primarily by STD but there are contagious mutant strains forming.

A vaccine is developed, but takes time to take fully, and is therefore a risk to an unborn child. Pregnancy would also lower the tolerance to the virus, so the decision is taken that in order to ensure compliance an implant will be given to every child at 11 that protects against the disease and pregnancy.

A lower dose is given in infancy, and again at 6, but it is recognised that young people will have sex, and therefore they need to have this vaccine at 11 to protect them fully for 5 years, and in such a way that they are covered fully - the disease has wasted most of the western economies.

The Vaccine would be a similar one to the Hepatitis A and B Vaccines that require administration several months.

Moves are now afoot that would include a hormone inhibitor to try and improve the behaviour of the young people vaccinated, which is a political and emotional minefield. Already there is an effective shut down on anyone that is non-compliant - social security, medical care and schooling are all dependent on receiving the vaccine.

I thought you likely know enough about this sort of thing to give us an educated opinion! :)

[ridicully]

Educated opinion? Me? *wibble* :)

But for what it's worth, it sounds logical to me.

[here-be-dragons.livejournal.com]

Hee! Thanks. I've passed this along to my friend (<lj user=angelofthenorth). :)